data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7bee9/7bee9b91d19db9e14c0d6bd7de22abf522e15591" alt=""
Random Quote
Thursday, October 06, 2005
What would Rumpole say?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7bee9/7bee9b91d19db9e14c0d6bd7de22abf522e15591" alt=""
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
OBSERVATIONS, THOUGHTS, OCCASIONAL RANTS, THINGS I FIND INTERESTING AND ANYTHING ELSE THAT I FEEL MOVED TO SHARE OR COMMENT ON - SOMETIMES THEY MAY EVEN INVOLVE THE LAW, LAWYERS, OR THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM.
2 comments:
"Protest" is much too nice a word for what appears to be an unlawful, coordinated joint boycott. I guess the Brits saw the success of the Massachusetts "Bar Advocates" -- 80% pay raise after using coercive boycotts and threats over two years, with no legal or ethical consequences -- and could not resist the temptation.
I've been following the Bar Advocate scandal since the summer of 2003 (see this page of blurbs and links). It culminated this July and August. (see Does Bar Advocate = Irresponsible Lawyer?)
Compare with the following: Los Angeles Times reports "San Bernardino County prosecutors and public defenders are clogging the already overburdened county court system with a flood of legal proceedings to protest stalled salary negotiations."
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-sbcourts5oct05,1,3450544.story?coll=la-headlines-california
Post a Comment